Nutrition & training plans
A scan without a plan is a report card. MARCH generates a 30-day training and nutrition block from the member's own segmental data, built on frameworks written by exercise scientists and registered dietitians, and routes it to your coach for review before it ever reaches the member.
The gap between knowing and doing
Most members leave a scan knowing their body fat percentage and having no idea what to do differently on Monday. The information was accurate and useless at the same time. Programming is what converts a measurement into a behavior change, and it is the step almost every facility skips because writing individual plans does not scale across a membership.
- Member learns a number and changes nothing
- Plans written from scratch, when they are written at all
- Nutrition advice given informally by whoever is asked
- Programming untethered from the measurement
- No defined endpoint, so no reason to return
- Every scan produces a concrete 30-day block
- Generated from that member's own segmental data
- Nutrition frameworks authored by credentialed professionals
- Programming and measurement on the same cycle
- The block ends where the next scan begins
Who actually writes these
Worth being precise here, because this is the claim a careful buyer will test.
Progressions built on published strength and conditioning research rather than assembled from whatever was popular online. The framework defines how volume, intensity and exercise selection move over a block.
Targets calibrated to lean mass rather than scale weight, written to be sustainable rather than aggressive. Registered dietitian is a protected credential; the distinction from 'nutritionist' matters legally in many states and we use the term deliberately.
The credentialed work is the framework. What gets generated per member is that framework applied to their segmental data, training history, available days and stated limitations.
Nothing reaches a member with your staff member's name on it that your staff member has not read and approved.
How a plan gets generated
Six inputs, one 30-day block, one review step.
Where lean mass actually sits and how it has moved since the last scan. A member whose lower body lags gets different programming from one whose trunk composition is the concern.
Captured at intake. The reason matters as much as the goal — someone training for a specific event gets a different block from someone trying to build a sustainable habit.
Programming that assumes too much experience gets abandoned; programming that assumes too little gets ignored. This is the input that calibrates both.
A four-day block handed to someone who can train twice a week fails on day one. The block is built around what they said they can actually do.
Anything the member flags that falls outside programming scope — injury, clinical concern, pregnancy, or anything a coach should hear directly — stops automatic generation and routes to a human conversation instead.
What the last 30 days produced, measured rather than guessed, feeds the next one. This is the part that makes the cadence compound.
The coach review step, and why it is not optional
This is the design decision that makes the rest defensible.
Facilities we've helped
Named facilities with numbers they agreed to share. The slot below is built and waiting — it stays empty until a pilot signs off on being named.
Case study slot
[Facility name], [city]
The number worth capturing here is adherence: how many members on generated plans were still following them at day 30, compared to however you handled programming before. Name the facility and the measurement window.
Plan adherence at 30 days
Change in members training 3+ days a week
Coach time saved per plan
See a plan generated from real scan data.
Book a 20-minute walkthrough. We'll generate a block from a sample scan on the call and show you the coach review queue.
No card required. We'll never contact your members.