Owner dashboard
Most gym software gives you a reporting suite nobody opens. MARCH gives you four numbers that tell you whether the scanner is earning, a weekly summary that arrives before you ask for it, and enough breakdown to act on what it shows.
A reporting suite you never open is worth nothing
Facility software generally fails at reporting in one of two directions: it either shows forty metrics nobody has time to interpret, or it shows revenue alone, which tells you what happened without telling you why. The useful version is a small number of figures that are causally linked, so that when one moves you know which lever moved it.
- Reports nobody opens after the first week
- Revenue totals with no explanation behind them
- Equipment utilization invisible at budget time
- Trainer capacity discovered when someone burns out
- Retention reviewed quarterly, far too late to act
- Four linked numbers, reviewed weekly
- Each one points at a specific action
- Utilization defensible in a budget conversation
- Capacity per trainer visible before it becomes a problem
- Retention tracked against scan frequency continuously
The four numbers
They are in this order deliberately. Each one feeds the next, so a problem at the top explains a problem further down.
The input to everything else. If this is low, nothing downstream can be high. The usual causes are narrow availability or a booking link that is not actually in front of members — both fixable the same week you notice.
The retention number in disguise. One scan is a receipt; a sequence is a relationship. If scans booked is healthy but cadence is low, the problem is the day-30 follow-up or the rebook-on-the-spot habit, not demand.
The revenue number. Scans that led to a booked consult, and consults that led to a package. If cadence is good but conversion is weak, the issue is the results conversation itself — usually a staff training problem rather than a software one.
The number that justifies the whole program. Shown against scan frequency specifically, because that correlation is the argument you take to a budget committee or a board.
Breakdowns that drive decisions
Aggregate numbers tell you something is wrong. Breakdowns tell you where.
Multi-site operations
Built for the association or group operator who needs both views without logging in twice.
Facilities we've helped
Named facilities with numbers they agreed to share. The slot below is built and waiting — it stays empty until a pilot signs off on being named.
Case study slot
[Organization name], [number] sites
The useful case study here is an operator who changed something because of what the dashboard showed, and can say what it was worth. A specific decision beats a general endorsement every time.
Change in scanner utilization
Decision made from dashboard data
Revenue impact of that decision
See the four numbers on your own data.
Book a 20-minute walkthrough. We'll set up your scan schedule on the call so the dashboard is showing your facility, not a demo account.
No card required. We'll never contact your members.